Court Document Archive

Clear Filters

… results in Court Document.

August 7, 2024
Case explainer: Loper Bright v. Raimondo
Jane Perkins and Sarah Somers Cases, Court Document
Read more
June 12, 2024
Fact Sheet Exhaustion, Abstention, Preclusion: Considerations for Filing Fair Hearings
Sarah Somers Issue Brief, Fact Sheet, Court Document
Medicaid applicants and beneficiaries have a choice of forum when eligibility or services are denied, terminated, or reduced. They have the right to a state administrative hearing to challenge a denial, termination, or reduction of eligibility or services, with a right to appeal an adverse decision to state court.…
Read more
February 7, 2024
AMICUS: Planned Parenthood of Montana v. Montana, Supreme Court of the State of Montana
Catherine McKee Cases, Court Document
In 2023, Montana imposed severe restrictions on coverage of abortion services for individuals enrolled in Medicaid. Reproductive health providers filed suit, arguing that the restrictions violate the Montana Constitution. The lower court granted the Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, and the State appealed. NHeLP filed an amicus brief…
Read more
September 18, 2023
EPSDT’s Legal Landscape & Implementation History
Amanda Avery and Jane Perkins Case Explainer, Fact Sheet, Regulations and Laws, Health Advocate, Court Document
This Fact Sheet provides essential information to help advocates become EPSDT experts. After giving an overview to EPSDT, we focus on: (1) legislative milestones; (2) notable federal agency guidance; and (3) precedent-setting cases from the judiciary. Next, we provide a snapshot of states’ performance implementing EPSDT, using government reports…
Read more
August 24, 2023
Medicaid Enrollees Challenge Florida’s Failure to Provide Due Process During Unwinding
Miriam Delaney Heard, Sarah Grusin, and Amanda Avery Case Explainer, Fact Sheet, Health Advocate, Court Document
Read more
February 15, 2023
Delegation of Rulemaking Authority in Light of the “Major Questions Doctrine”
Jane Perkins and Erica Turret* Fact Sheet, Issue Brief, Court Document
In West Virginia v. EPA, the Supreme Court addressed a “particular and recurring problem: agencies asserting highly consequential power beyond what Congress could reasonably be understood to have granted.” By a 6-3 majority, the Court held that, when a “major question” is involved, the decision on how to regulate…
Read more

Court Document Archive

Never miss a thing.

Subscribe today.

Case explainer: Loper Bright v. Raimondo

Fact Sheet Exhaustion, Abstention, Preclusion: Considerations for Filing Fair Hearings

AMICUS: Planned Parenthood of Montana v. Montana, Supreme Court of the State of Montana

EPSDT’s Legal Landscape & Implementation History

Medicaid Enrollees Challenge Florida’s Failure to Provide Due Process During Unwinding

Delegation of Rulemaking Authority in Light of the “Major Questions Doctrine”