- Show all
- Abigail Coursolle
- Brian Brooks
- Fabiola Carrión
- Amy Chen
- daryln
- Corey Davis
- Andrew DiAntonio
- Elizabeth Edwards
- Candace Gibson
- Sarah Grusin
- Héctor Hernández-Delgado
- Rachel Holtzman
- Priscilla Huang
- Alicia Kauk
- Jennifer Lav
- Leonardo Cuello
- Jeremy Leaming
- Kimberly Lewis
- lhigashi
- David Machledt
- Elizabeth McCaman
- Catherine McKee
- Joe McLean
- Michelle Lilienfeld
- National Health Law Program Team
- Hayley Penan
- Jane Perkins
- Alexis Robles
- Susan Berke Fogel
- Sarah Somers
- Elizabeth G. Taylor
- veng
- Wayne Turner
- Mara Youdelman
- Show all
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- District of Columbia
- Florida
- Georgia
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- National
- New Hampshire
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Virginia
- Washington
- Show all
- 50th Anniversary
- Abortion
- Affordable Care Act
- Child and Adolescent Health
- CHIP
- Civil Procedure
- Civil Rights
- Cost-sharing
- Court Access
- Data Collection
- Defending Medicaid
- Demonstrations
- Disability Rights
- Doula Care
- Dual Eligible Beneficiaries
- Eligibility and Enrollment
- EPSDT
- Exchanges/Marketplaces
- Family Planning
- HCBS/LTSS
- Health Care Reform
- Health Care Refusals
- Health Disparities
- Health Reform
- HIV/AIDS and Sexual Health
- Language Access
- LGBTQ Health
- Litigation
- Managed Care
- Medicaid
- Mental Health
- Nondiscrimination
- Opioid Use Disorder
- Oral Health
- Pregnancy
- Prescription Drugs Marketplace
- Prescription Drugs Medicaid
- Privacy and Confidentiality
- Public Health
- Reproductive Health
- Services
- Supreme Court
- Waivers and Demonstrations
- Women's Health
- Women's Health
Archives
- June 18, 2019
Final Motions in Philbrick v. Azar (New Hampshire Section 1115 Medicaid Waiver Project)
Read more"In short, coverage remains the fundamental objective of the Medicaid Act. Nothing about the statute's text, structure, or interpretation in case law sanctions projects that put fiscal considerations in conflict with coverage," the National Health Law Program's reply and response motion in Philbrick v. Azar states. Throughout the 45-page…
- April 8, 2019
I.N. v. Kent (Preliminary Approval of Class Settlement)
Read moreOrder in I.N., minor, v. Jennifer Kent, Director of the Department of Health Care Services, and State of California Department of Health Care Services, granting motions for class action certification and preliminary approval for class settlement.
- April 1, 2019
National Health Law Program Joins Advocates in Urging Appeals Court to Uphold Constitutionality of Affordable Care Act
Read moreHealth care advocates including, Families USA, Community Catalyst, National Health Law Program, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, and Services Union Employees International, filed an amici curiae brief in April in support of California and numerous other state attorneys general who urging the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals…
- March 20, 2019
Philbrick v. Azar
Read moreRepresenting low-income individuals from New Hampshire, the National Health Law Program, New Hampshire Legal Assistance and National Center for Law and Economic Justice filed a lawsuit, Philbrick v. Azar, March 20 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, challenging HHS approval of New Hampshire's Medicaid waiver…
- March 1, 2019
Protections For N.C. Medicaid Beneficiaries: Hawkins v. Cohen
Read moreHawkins Summary Hawkins v. Cohen (5:17-CV-581 E.D.N.C.) is a federal lawsuit filed in 2017 by Charlotte Center for Legal Advocacy and the National Health Law Program to stop illegal terminations of Medicaid benefits in North Carolina. The Court hearing the case has certified it as a class action. This…
- December 18, 2018
Amicus Brief in Support of Maryland’s Anti-Price Gouging Law for Prescription Drugs
Read moreThe National Health Law Program filed an amicus brief with the United States Supreme Court asking it to review a 4th Circuit decision that struck down Maryland's anti-price gouging law for prescription drugs as unconstitutional. The brief focuses on the impact of high drug costs on low-income people and…