- Show all
- Abigail Coursolle
- Alejandra Pavisich
- Brian Brooks
- Fabiola Carrión
- Amy Chen
- daryln
- Corey Davis
- Andrew DiAntonio
- Elizabeth Edwards
- Candace Gibson
- Sarah Grusin
- Héctor Hernández-Delgado
- Rachel Holtzman
- Priscilla Huang
- Alicia Emanuel
- Jennifer Lav
- Leonardo Cuello
- Jeremy Leaming
- Kimberly Lewis
- lhigashi
- David Machledt
- Elizabeth McCaman
- Catherine McKee
- Joe McLean
- Maya Levin
- Michelle Lilienfeld
- Lisa Munoz
- National Health Law Program Team
- Hayley Penan
- Jane Perkins
- Alexis Robles
- Susan Berke Fogel
- Sarah Somers
- Elizabeth G. Taylor
- veng
- Wayne Turner
- Mara Youdelman
- Daniel Young
- Show all
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- District of Columbia
- Florida
- Georgia
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- National
- New Hampshire
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Virginia
- Washington
- Show all
- 50th Anniversary
- Abortion
- Affordable Care Act
- Child and Adolescent Health
- CHIP
- Civil Procedure
- Civil Rights
- Cost-sharing
- Court Access
- Data Collection
- Defending Medicaid
- Demonstrations
- Disability Rights
- Doula Care
- Dual Eligible Beneficiaries
- Eligibility and Enrollment
- EPSDT
- Exchanges/Marketplaces
- Family Planning
- HCBS/LTSS
- Health Care Reform
- Health Care Refusals
- Health Disparities
- Health Reform
- HIV/AIDS and Sexual Health
- Language Access
- LGBTQ Health
- Litigation
- Managed Care
- Medicaid
- Mental Health
- Nondiscrimination
- Opioid Use Disorder
- Oral Health
- Pregnancy
- Prescription Drugs Marketplace
- Prescription Drugs Medicaid
- Privacy and Confidentiality
- Public Charge
- Public Health
- Reproductive Health
- Services
- Supreme Court
- Waivers and Demonstrations
- Women's Health
- Women's Health
Archives
- November 7, 2019
Complaint: AA v. Gee, U.S. District Court of the Middle District of Louisiana
Read moreLouisiana is failing to meet its obligation to provide mental health services to Medicaid-eligible children and families in the state, forcing thousands to unnecessarily cycle in and out of hospitals and psychiatric facilities far away from their homes for extended periods of time, and forcing some to become inappropriately…
- September 23, 2019
Complaint Rose v. Azar
Litigation Team Court DocumentRead moreIndiana residents enrolled in Medicaid filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration challenging its extension of a Section 1115 project (HIP 2.0) allowing the State to condition Medicaid eligibility on compliance with work requirements. The approval also permits Indiana to charge enrollees premiums; terminate coverage and prohibit re-enrollment in…
- September 23, 2019
Rose v. Azar, D.D.C.
Litigation Team Court Document, CasesRead moreIndiana residents enrolled in Medicaid filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration challenging its extension of a Section 1115 project (HIP 2.0) allowing the State to condition Medicaid eligibility on compliance with work requirements. The approval also permits Indiana to charge enrollees premiums; terminate coverage and prohibit re-enrollment in…
- September 1, 2019
Declaration of Leighton Ku in La Clínica de la Raza v. Trump
Litigation Team Court Document, CasesRead moreThis declaration examines the potential effects of the final public charge regulation issued by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Specifically, Dr. Ku produces independent, evidence-based analyses and estimates that between 1.0 million and 3.1 million members of immigrant families would drop or forego Medicaid coverage or disenroll due…
- August 16, 2019
La Clinica De La Raza et al v. Trump, Northern District of California
Litigation Team Court Document, CasesRead moreNonprofits serving immigrant communities filed a lawsuit challenging the Trump administration’s “public charge” regulation. Under the Immigration and Nationality Act, individuals seeking admission to the U.S. or seeking to adjust their status to lawful permanent residence may be denied if they are "likely at any time to become a…
- July 8, 2019
National Health Law Program Amicus Brief, Title X Final Rule Challenges
Read moreCourt Cases On March 4, 2019 the Trump Administration announced a new final regulation change to the Title X Family Planning Program. The new rule significantly curtails access to comprehensive family planning services, and disproportionately impacts low-income individuals and people of color. Title X is an extremely impactful federal…