Case: Medicaid
By: Jane Perkins
On December 18, 2024, the Supreme Court agreed to hear a case presenting the question: does the Medicaid free choice of provider provision, 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(23)(A), unambiguously confers a right upon beneficiaries to choose a specific provider? After giving some background on enforcement of the Medicaid Act, this Case Explainer focuses on this case.
When certiorari was granted, the case was called Kerr v. Planned Parenthood. Eunice Medina has since become the Interim Director of the South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services and, under federal rules, is substituted as the petitioner.
Case: Medicaid
NHeLP comments opposing work requirements and other harmful proposals in Arizona's Health Care Cost Containment System section 1115 extension…
NHeLP comments to an Interim Final Regulation opposing HHS's attempt to weaken the Maintenance of Effort requirement protecting Medicaid…
Several major paths exist for states to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic using Medicaid. States have numerous points of…