Case: Medicaid
By: Jane Perkins
On December 18, 2024, the Supreme Court agreed to hear a case presenting the question: does the Medicaid free choice of provider provision, 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(23)(A), unambiguously confers a right upon beneficiaries to choose a specific provider? After giving some background on enforcement of the Medicaid Act, this Case Explainer focuses on this case.
When certiorari was granted, the case was called Kerr v. Planned Parenthood. Eunice Medina has since become the Interim Director of the South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services and, under federal rules, is substituted as the petitioner.
Case: Medicaid
With help from Gordon Bonnyman from the Tennessee Justice Center, National Health Law Program provides the 2025 updated "A…
The Medicaid Act requires that state payments for Medicaid are sufficient to provide at least equivalent access to care…
NHeLP submitted the following Statement for the Record in response to the Senate Committee on Finance's Hearing on "Youth…