Case: Medicaid
By: Jane Perkins
On December 18, 2024, the Supreme Court agreed to hear a case presenting the question: does the Medicaid free choice of provider provision, 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(23)(A), unambiguously confers a right upon beneficiaries to choose a specific provider? After giving some background on enforcement of the Medicaid Act, this Case Explainer focuses on this case.
When certiorari was granted, the case was called Kerr v. Planned Parenthood. Eunice Medina has since become the Interim Director of the South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services and, under federal rules, is substituted as the petitioner.
Case: Medicaid
In comments to HHS, NHeLP urges the Secretary to reject Pennsylvania's Section 1115 demonstration extension request to continue waiving…
State Medicaid agencies and their contractors are increasingly relying on preset guidelines or assessment tools or both to make…
In this letter to CMS NHeLP recommends that CMS not approve reductions to Pennsylvania's Medicaid state plan benefit pursuant…