Case: Medicaid
By: Jane Perkins
On December 18, 2024, the Supreme Court agreed to hear a case presenting the question: does the Medicaid free choice of provider provision, 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(23)(A), unambiguously confers a right upon beneficiaries to choose a specific provider? After giving some background on enforcement of the Medicaid Act, this Case Explainer focuses on this case.
When certiorari was granted, the case was called Kerr v. Planned Parenthood. Eunice Medina has since become the Interim Director of the South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services and, under federal rules, is substituted as the petitioner.
Case: Medicaid
In 2023, Montana imposed severe restrictions on coverage of abortion services for individuals enrolled in Medicaid. Reproductive health providers…
This case update focuses on Rose v. Becerra, which challenges approval of a Section 1115 Medicaid project in Indiana.…
Medicaid offers myriad optional services and benefits that states can cover, as well as a minimum baseline of services…