How Per Capita Caps Harm the Prevention and Treatment of New Viruses

Executive Summary

If Congress enacts a per capita cap on Medicaid, states will have fewer resources to prevent and treat the spread of emerging diseases, such as the recent outbreak of Zika in the southern United States and Puerto Rico. In this issue brief, Staff Attorney Candace Gibson argues that proposed changes to Medicaid funding, specifically per capita caps and block grants, not only cut funding to the program, but also leave states vulnerable to unforseen public health crises. Using the recent Zika virus outbreak as a model, Gibson demonstrates how proposed per capita caps would be insufficient to cover the cost of treatment and prevention and render states unable to effectively fight new disease outbreaks.

Related Content

For almost 50 years, the National Health Law Program has fought to expand access to quality health care to low-income individuals and underserved communities. Today we are pleased to launch a newly designed website for our future work to make health care a reality for all people. Please take time to peruse our new site, and sign up for our email updates to learn about us, watch the work we do, and become engaged.

Continue to site