- Show all
- Abigail Coursolle
- Alejandra Pavisich
- Alexis Robles-Fradet
- Alicia Emanuel
- Amy Chen
- Andy DiAntonio
- Brian Brooks
- Candace Gibson
- Carly Myers
- Cat Duffy
- Catherine McKee
- Cathren Cohen
- Charly Gilfoil
- Corey Davis
- Dania Douglas
- Daniel Young
- daryln
- David Machledt
- Elizabeth Edwards
- Elizabeth G. Taylor
- Eskedar Girmash
- Fabiola Carrión
- Georgesula Ziama
- Geron Gadd
- Hannah Eichner
- Hayley Penan
- Héctor Hernández-Delgado
- Ian McDonald
- Jane Perkins
- Jasmine Young
- Jennifer Lav
- Joe McLean
- Kasey Nichols
- Kimberly Lewis
- Leonardo Cuello
- lhigashi
- Lisa Munoz
- Liz McCaman Taylor
- Madeline Morcelle
- Mara Youdelman
- Maya Levin
- Michelle Lilienfeld
- Michelle Yiu
- Miriam Delaney Heard
- Mizue Suito
- Priscilla Huang
- Rachel Holtzman
- Sarah Grusin
- Sarah Somers
- Skyler Rosellini
- Susan Berke Fogel
- T. Nancy Lam
- veng
- Wayne Turner
- Zamir M. Brown
- Show all
- Alabama
- Alaska
- All United States
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- District of Columbia
- Florida
- Georgia
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- National
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
- February 15, 2023
Delegation of Rulemaking Authority in Light of the “Major Questions Doctrine”
Jane Perkins and Erica Turret* Court Document, Issue Brief, Fact SheetRead moreIn West Virginia v. EPA, the Supreme Court addressed a “particular and recurring problem: agencies asserting highly consequential power beyond what Congress could reasonably be understood to have granted.” By a 6-3 majority, the Court held that, when a “major question” is involved, the decision on how to regulate…
- November 8, 2022
Case Summary: Georgia v. Brooks-LaSure – Medicaid Work Requirements Reappear
Jane Perkins and Erica Turret* Fact Sheet, Cases, GuideRead moreA federal court in Georgia has set aside a decision by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) that had rescinded the work requirement and premium components of a section 1115 Medicaid project. The US Department of Justice did not appeal the ruling. Georgia becomes the only state…
- June 29, 2022
Amicus Brief of NHeLP and the Kennedy Forum in E.W. v. Health Net
Read moreThis amicus brief was submitted to provide the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals with information about the serious need for behavioral health services in this country and the importance of meeting the disclosure requirements so that people may identify parity violations and appeal with all the information necessary.
- April 6, 2022
Q&A: Recent EPSDT Cases
Read moreThe Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnostic and Treatment provisions are among the most specific in the Medicaid Act. This Fact Sheet summarizes three recent court cases that analyze what states must do to comply with EPSDT and discusses an opinion certifying an EPSDT case as class action.
- June 11, 2021
Demanding Ascertainable Standards: Medicaid as a Case Study
Read moreState Medicaid agencies and their contractors are increasingly relying on preset guidelines or assessment tools or both to make coverage decisions. Problems arise when the use of these tools results in program enrollees and advocates being refused access to the standards and procedures that govern the operation of the…
- February 23, 2021
NHeLP Comments to Arizona AHCCCS Extension Application (2021)
Read moreNHeLP comments opposing work requirements and other harmful proposals in Arizona's Health Care Cost Containment System section 1115 extension application.
