Philbrick v. Becerra, D.D.C., D.C. Circuit, and Supreme Court

By: Litigation Team

Executive Summary

Four low-income individuals from New Hampshire enrolled in Medicaid filed a class action lawsuit against the Trump administration challenging its approval of New Hampshire’s Medicaid waiver project, which includes an illegal work requirement and cuts to services, such as retroactive coverage.

Partners: New Hampshire Legal Assistance, National Center for Law and Economic Justice

This case was formerly named Philbrick v. Azar.

Documents:

Complaint

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment

Amicus Brief for Deans, Chairs, and Scholars

Amicus Brief for Justice in Aging, National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys, and Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund

Amicus Brief for American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Medical Association

Federal Defendants Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss or Summary Judgment

New Hampshire Memorandum in Support of Partial Summary Judgment

Plaintiffs’ Reply in Support of Summary Judgment and Response to Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment

Federal Defendants’ Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss and Summary Judgment

New Hampshire’s Reply in Support of Summary Judgment

Opinion

Court of Appeals

Order Summary Affirmance

 

Supreme Court – Appeals combined with Gresham v. Azar

Brief for the Federal Petitioners

Arkansas Brief for the Petitioners

New Hampshire Brief for the Petitioners

Amicus from the State of Nebraska in Support of Petitioners

Amicus from the State of Indiana in Support of Petitioners

Amicus from the Foundation for Government Accountability in Support of Petitioners

Brief for Respondents

Last Updated: 02/19/2021

Case: , , , ,

Related Content