Waiver 1115 Information

Section 1115 Medicaid waivers allow states to explore new options for providing health coverage to persons who would otherwise not be eligible and allow states to examine innovative ways to deliver care by waiving certain requirements of the Medicaid Act.

While waivers can be important tools that can help states respond to the needs of low-income individuals, they also present concerns for health advocates working to protect the rights of Medicaid enrollees and promote transparency in state waiver processes.

Sec. 1115 of the Social Security Act allows the Secretary of Health and Human Services to waive some requirements of the Medicaid Act so that states can test novel approaches to improving medical assistance for low-income people.

Under the current administration, several states are seeking waivers to impose harmful cuts and restrictions. The first set of harmful waivers have been approved for Kentucky and Arkansas, with a number of states seeking to enact similar changes to Medicaid. Learn more about Medicaid waivers and how the National Health Law Program is combating the Trump administration’s illegal use of waivers to weaken Medicaid.

View 1115 Waiver Resources By State

search submit icon
results by Jane Perkins in Waivers and Demonstrations.
  • Stewart v. Azar: Plaintiffs Reply to Government Motions to Dismiss

    The Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has maintained in Stewart v. Azar that nothing in the Medicaid Act limits his ability to waive portions of it, the National Health Law Program, Kentucky Equal Justice Center and the Southern Poverty Law Center state in their May 14 reply to the motions by HHS and the Kentucky government to dismiss the lawsuit challenging HHS's approval of Kentucky's Medicaid waiver project. "The Secretary's approval also rewrites the purposes of the Act to 'restructure' Medicaid into a work-oriented program aimed at teaching people about commercial insurance. Encouraging individuals to work may be a worthy policy goal, but it is manifestly not the goal of Medicaid, which Congress enacted to provide 'medical assistance' and 'rehabilitation and other services' to those individuals  'whose income and resources are insufficient to meet the costs of necessary medical services," the advocates' reply states.

  • National Health Law Program Urges HHS to Reject Arizona’s Medicaid Waiver Plan

    In comments to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS), the National Health Law Program explains why Arizona's proposed Section 1115 Medicaid Waiver Amendment is flawed and legally suspect. Arizona's amended Medicaid waiver project includes an onerous work reporting requirement and lifetime limits on Medicaid. Work requirements are well-documented by extensive research that shows they do "little or nothing to increase stable, long-term employment and does not decrease poverty." Regarding Arizona's time-limit, the National Health Law Program notes, " Congress did not intend to limit Medicaid to temporary health care coverage. Instead, Congress designed Medicaid to furnish medical assistance to low-income individuals who cannot afford the costs of necessary medical care when and for long as they have a medical necessity for such assistance."

  • Leading Health Law Scholars Urge Court to Reject KY Medicaid Waiver Project

    A group of the nation's leading health law scholars is urging the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to reject federal approval of Kentucky's Medicaid waiver program in Stewart v. Azar. The health law scholars state in their friend-of-the court brief, that HHS's approval of Kentucky's Medicaid waiver project was outside the parameters of the Medicaid program, because "the waiver will reduce coverage, and with it, ongoing care. Even the state's own numbers show that rather than improving Medicaid, its actions will cull the rolls of both people who qualify for Medicaid as part of the ACA expansion as well as those eligible under traditional program rules." The scholars brief continues that Congress did not intend for Sec. 1115 waivers to be used to limit access to Medicaid. This so-called "demonstration" waiver, "destroys, not improves, Kentucky's substantial health care achievements and defeats, rather than promotes, Medicaid's purpose as a safety net insurer," the scholars' brief states.

  • Stewart v. Azar, Summary Judgement Motion in HHS KY Medicaid Waiver Case

    The Trump administration's approval of Kentucky's Medicaid waiver project with its onerous work requirements and other legally suspect obstacles to health care for low-income individuals violates Medicaid law because the administration has "effectively rewritten the Medicaid Act, bypassing congressional restrictions by regulatory fiat, overturning a half century of administrative practice, ignoring large swaths of social science evidence and data, and threatening irreparable harm to the health and welfare of tens of thousands of people," state National Health Law Program, Kentucky Equal Justice Center, and the Souther Poverty Law Center (SPLC) in their Memorandum In Support Of Motion For Summary Judgement in Stewart v. Azar. The health and human rights groups, representing more than a dozen Kentucky Medicaid beneficiaries, sued the Trump administration in January in federal court arguing that the approval of Kentucky's Medicaid wavier scheme was illegal, and must be rescinded.

  • NHeLP Comments to HHS on Kansas’ Sec. 1115 Medicaid Waiver Project

    In comments to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS), National Health Law Program urges the Secretary to reject Kansas' Sec. 1115 Medicaid waiver project, so-called "KanCare 2.0."  The state's waiver scheme includes imposing work requirements on eligibility, extended lockout periods, lifetime limits, and a coercive incentive for beneficiaries to discontinue a Social Security disability determination, which are all punitive measures that will only bring further harm to beneficiaries, cause thousands to lose Medicaid coverage, and reduce access to necessary care, the National Health Law Program states in its comments to HHS.

  • NHeLP Comments to HHS on N.C.’s Amended Sec. 1115 Waiver Project

    In comments to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS), National Health Law Program urges the Secretary to reject North Carolina's amended Sec. 1115 waiver "demonstration" program, which includes an onerous work requirement for eligibility, lock-outs and premiums, and a sweeping and unnecessary provision that would harm access to quality care for North Carolinians seeking services for substance use disorders and mental health services. The National Health Law Program says North Carolina's waiver project is outside the scope of the Medicaid Act, and beyond the HHS Secretary's authority to approve.

  • Summary of Lawsuit Filed Against HHS Approval of Kentucky Waivers

    On January 12, 2018 the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) approved numerous section 1115 waivers in Kentucky (KY Waivers). Because the approvals violate numerous provisions of law and will gravely harm hundreds of thousands of Kentuckians, the National Health Law Program (NHeLP) brought a lawsuit challenging them on January 24, 2018. NHeLP brought the lawsuit together with the Kentucky Equal Justice Center and the Southern Poverty Law Center. This summary lays out the basics of the lawsuit, the legal claims, as well as next steps for the litigation.

  • NHeLP Letter to CMS Regarding Work Requirements

    In an unprecedented move, HHS issued a letter announcing its intention to approve state requests to impose work requirements on Medicaid enrollees. NHeLP responded swiftly, submitting a letter to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), explaining why the radical shift in Medicaid policy is procedurally and substantively flawed. Further, the few studies CMS cites to support work requirements do not backup CMS's conclusion that any and all work produces positive health outcomes.

  • NHeLP Comments on Massachusetts’ Amended Sec. 1115 Waiver Project

    In comments to the U.S. Department of of Health and Human Services (HHS), NHeLP urges it to reject Massachusetts' Section 1115 waiver project because the state proposes changes to Medicaid that would undermine the purpose of the law and harm low-income people who need Medicaid for health care. Massachusetts seeks to waive requirements to shift costs to the federal government and reduce benefits and access to care for critical services without a clear experimental purpose. Additionally, number of the state's proposals lack key details that make it impossible for the public to evaluate the state's proposed changes, while others fall outside the legal scope of 1115 authority.

  • NHeLP Comments to HHS on New Hampshire’s Amended Medicaid Waiver Project

    In comments to the U.S. Department of of Health and Human Services (HHS), NHeLP urges it to reject New Hampshire's amended Section 1115 waiver project because the state proposes changes to Medicaid that would undermine the purpose of the law and harm low-income and underserved people who need Medicaid for health care. New Hampshire's amended waiver project includes a so-called "work requirement," that are an "illegal condition of eligibility ...," and have never been approved by HHS. "Conditioning Medicaid eligibility on completion of work activities gets it exactly backwards by blocking access to care and services that help individuals be able to work," NHeLP's HHS comments state.

Load More