Administrative Procedure Act Archive

Submit site search
Clear Filters

Never miss a thing.

Subscribe today.

Subscribe
… results in Administrative Procedure Act.
  • February 17, 2023

    Carr v. Becerra, District of Connecticut

    Litigation Team

    Plaintiffs in Carr v. Becerra challenged an Interim Final Rule that required states to trim their Medicaid rolls in violation of the “Families First Coronavirus Response Act,” passed by Congress in March 2020. In exchange for receiving billions of dollars of additional federal funding, states are forbidden under that…

    Read more
  • May 20, 2022

    AMICUS: Georgia v. Brooks-LaSure,Southern District of Georgia, Brunswick Division

    Litigation Team

    In late 2021, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services rescinded its 2020 approval of work requirements and premiums in Georgia. Georgia filed suit to challenge the withdrawal. The National Health Law Program, along with the Southern Poverty Law Center, Georgians for a Healthy Future, Georgia Legal Services Program,…

    Read more
  • March 29, 2022

    McCutchen v. Becerra, D.D.C.

    and

    Thirteen Medicaid enrollees, a pediatrician, and the Tennessee Justice Center are challenging the approval of the TennCare III project as a violation of the APA. The approval caps the amount of federal funding available to the State, continues Tennessee's decades-long waiver of retroactive coverage, and permits the State to…

    Read more
  • August 18, 2020

    Amicus: State of Washington v. U.S. Dep’t Health & Human Servs., Western District of Washington

    Litigation Team

    The National Health Law Program filed this brief, signed by 11 other organizations in support of the State of Washington’s efforts to enjoin the Administration’s changes to the rules for the ACA’s non-discrimination provision, Section 1557. The 2020 Revised Rule regarding section 1557 of the Patient Protection and Affordable…

    Read more
  • November 22, 2019

    Young v. Azar, D.D.C.

    , , and

    Four low-income individuals from Michigan enrolled in Medicaid filed a class action lawsuit against the Trump administration challenging its approval of Michigan’s Medicaid waiver project, which includes an illegal work requirement and allows Michigan to charge enrollees premiums and terminate coverage for failure to complete certain “healthy behaviors.” Partners: Center…

    Read more
  • September 23, 2019

    Rose v. Azar, D.D.C.

    Litigation Team ,

    Indiana residents enrolled in Medicaid filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration challenging its extension of a Section 1115 project (HIP 2.0) allowing the State to condition Medicaid eligibility on compliance with work requirements. The approval also permits Indiana to charge enrollees premiums; terminate coverage and prohibit re-enrollment in…

    Read more