- Abigail Coursolle
- Alejandra Pavisich
- Alejandra Pavisich
- Alexis Robles-Fradet
- Alicia Emanuel
- Amanda Avery
- Amy Chen
- Andy DiAntonio
- Arielle Linsey
- Brian Brooks
- Candace Gibson
- Carly Myers
- Cassandra LaRose
- Cat Duffy
- Catherine McKee
- Cathren Cohen
- Charlie Blodnieks
- Charly Gilfoil
- Cheyenne Peters
- Christina Piecora
- Corey Davis
- Dania Douglas
- Daniel Young
- David Machledt
- Deanna Hartog
- Elizabeth Edwards
- Elizabeth G. Taylor
- Emma Parker-Newton
- Eskedar Girmash
- Fabiola De Liban
- Georgesula Ziama
- Geron Gadd
- Hannah Eichner
- Hayley Penan
- Héctor Hernández-Delgado
- Ian McDonald
- Jane Perkins
- Jasmine Young
- Jennifer Lav
- Joe McLean
- Jules Lutaba
- Kally Xu
- Kasey Nichols
- Kavisha Prajapati
- Kimberly Lewis
- Leonardo Cuello
- lhigashi
- Liz McCaman Taylor
- Madeline Morcelle
- Mara Youdelman
- Margaret Okakpu
- Maya Levin
- Michelle Lilienfeld
- Michelle Yiu
- Miriam Delaney Heard
- Mizue Suito
- Priscilla Huang
- Rachel Holtzman
- Rolonda Donelson
- Sarah Grusin
- Sarah Somers
- Skyler Rosellini
- Susan Berke Fogel
- T. Nancy Lam
- veng
- Walter Hsiang, MD
- Wayne Turner
- Zamir M. Brown
- Show all
- Alabama
- Alaska
- All United States
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- District of Columbia
- Florida
- Georgia
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- National
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
- June 10, 2021
NHeLP AHRQ Comments
Read moreIn these comments, NHeLP responds to a request for information from AHRQ regarding the use of clinical algorithms that have the potential to introduce racial/ethnic bias into healthcare delivery. Using our long history of litigation and advocacy on issues that involve the use of automated decision-making systems, including algorithms,…
- December 8, 2020
Testimony on the Hyde Amendment before the House Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies
Read moreThe National Health Law Program (NHeLP) submitted this testimony to the House Committee on Appropriations’ Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies' hearing on "The Impact on Women Seeking an Abortion but are Denied Because of an Inability to Pay." We advocate for Medicaid policies…
- October 19, 2020
What Public Charge Means for Reproductive Justice
Read moreUpdate: As of March 9, 2021, the Trump-era public charge regulations are no longer in effect. The Biden administration published a final rule on March 15, 2021 formally removing the Trump-era public charge rule and restoring the long-standing 1999 Field Guidance as the standing public charge policy. The administration has significant work…
- July 16, 2020
June Medical Services v. Russo and the Work that Remains for Underserved Populations
Read moreOn June 29th, the Supreme Court ruled in June Medical Services vs. Russo that Louisiana’s admitting privileges law is unconstitutional and blocked it from taking effect. This win for reproductive health advocates means that abortion clinics can remain open to serve patients who need abortion care in Louisiana and…
- May 27, 2020
Top Ten List: Reproductive and Sexual Health Care Access in the Time of COVID-19
Read moreThe COVID-19 pandemic is exposing and exacerbating pervasive obstacles to sexual health, family planning, prenatal, labor and delivery, postpartum, and abortion care in the U.S. It is also illuminating how overlapping systems of oppression unjustly mar the health and wellbeing of people with disabilities, LGBTQ individuals, and people of…
- February 18, 2020
Comments on HHS Proposed Rule on Religiously-Affiliated Providers
Read moreHHS is attempting to roll back important protections for individuals seeking services from religiously-affiliated providers in a rulemaking it calls “Ensuring Equal Treatment of Faith-Based Providers.” The proposed rule would encourage religiously-affiliated providers to refuse to employ non-adherents and require that all employees and applicants for employment conform to…
