Gresham v. Azar: Plaintiffs’ Summary Judgment Motion

Executive Summary

If the Trump administration’s Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the state of Arkansas want to to “radically restructure” Medicaid, “then they must secure the consent of Congress. It is not for them to achieve that end by administrative fiat,” state the plaintiffs in a summary judgment motion filed in the Arkansas lawsuit challenging HHS’s approval of Arkansas’ legally flawed Medicaid waiver scheme, called the “Arkansas Works Amendment.” The plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment also states, HHS did not approve “Arkansas Works Amendment” to promote the objectives of Medicaid, “but to ‘fundamentally transform’ the Medicaid program through agency action.” The administrations CMS director issued a “State Medicaid Director Letter announcing a new policy establishing requirements for states that wish to condition medical assistance on compliance with work requirements, with minimal evidence for how work requirements will further Medicaid’s purpose.” Download the Arkansas plaintiffs’ entire summary judgement motion.

Click here to read all of the relevant legal documents in Gresham v. Azar.

Related Content

Medicaid's 56th Anniversary
Medicaid 56th anniversary imageNHeLP has defended Medicaid for over 50 years. This week, we are celebrating the 56th anniversary of Medicaid and recommitting to our efforts to protect and advance health rights for all. Join us in celebration with a donation today! Happy Birthday Medicaid!

DONATE NOW