- Abigail Coursolle
- Alejandra Pavisich
- Alejandra Pavisich
- Alexis Robles-Fradet
- Alicia Emanuel
- Amanda Avery
- Amy Chen
- Andy DiAntonio
- Arielle Linsey
- Brian Brooks
- Candace Gibson
- Carly Myers
- Cassandra LaRose
- Cat Duffy
- Catherine McKee
- Cathren Cohen
- Charlie Blodnieks
- Charly Gilfoil
- Cheyenne Peters
- Christina Piecora
- Corey Davis
- Dania Douglas
- Daniel Young
- David Machledt
- Deanna Hartog
- Elizabeth Edwards
- Elizabeth G. Taylor
- Emma Parker-Newton
- Eskedar Girmash
- Fabiola De Liban
- Georgesula Ziama
- Geron Gadd
- Hannah Eichner
- Hayley Penan
- Héctor Hernández-Delgado
- Ian McDonald
- Jane Perkins
- Jasmine Young
- Jennifer Lav
- Joe McLean
- Jules Lutaba
- Kally Xu
- Kasey Nichols
- Kavisha Prajapati
- Kimberly Lewis
- Leonardo Cuello
- lhigashi
- Liz McCaman Taylor
- Madeline Morcelle
- Mara Youdelman
- Margaret Okakpu
- Maya Levin
- Michelle Lilienfeld
- Michelle Yiu
- Miriam Delaney Heard
- Mizue Suito
- Priscilla Huang
- Rachel Holtzman
- Rolonda Donelson
- Sarah Grusin
- Sarah Somers
- Skyler Rosellini
- Susan Berke Fogel
- T. Nancy Lam
- veng
- Walter Hsiang, MD
- Wayne Turner
- Zamir M. Brown
- Show all
- Alabama
- Alaska
- All United States
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- District of Columbia
- Florida
- Georgia
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- National
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
- Show all
- 1557
- 50th Anniversary
- Abortion
- Admin and Procedural Barriers
- ADS Evergreen
- Affordable Care Act
- Assisted Reproduction
- Automated Decision Making
- Behavioral Health
- Child and Adolescent Health
- CHIP
- Civil Procedure
- Civil Rights
- Coronavirus
- Cost-sharing
- Court Access
- COVID-19 Public Health Emergency
- Data Collection
- Defending Medicaid
- Delivery System Featured
- Delivery System Reform
- Demonstrations
- Disability
- Disability Rights
- Doula Care
- Dual Eligible Beneficiaries
- Eligibility and Enrollment
- EPSDT
- Exchanges/Marketplaces
- Family Planning
- Federal and State Court Cases
- Foster youth
- HCBS/LTSS
- Health Care Reform
- Health Care Refusals
- Health Disparities
- Health Reform
- HIV/AIDS and Sexual Health
- Home and Community Based Services
- Immigrant Health
- Language Access
- LGBTQ Health
- Litigation
- Managed Care
- Medi-Cal
- Medicaid
- Medicaid Awareness Month
- Medicaid Awareness Month 2024
- Mental Health
- Nondiscrimination
- Opioid Use Disorder
- Oral Health
- Pregnancy
- Prescription Drugs Marketplace
- Prescription Drugs Medicaid
- Privacy and Confidentiality
- Protect Medicaid 2023
- Public Charge
- Public Health
- Refusals of SRH Care
- Reproductive Health
- Services
- Sexual and Reproductive Health (SRH)
- Sexual Health
- SRH Equity
- SRH Equity for Immigrants
- SRH Equity for LGBTQI+ People
- SRH Equity for People of Color
- SRH Equity for People with Disabilities
- SRH Equity for Young People
- SRH Nondiscrimination
- Supreme Court
- Telehealth
- Waivers and Demonstrations
- Women's Health
- December 19, 2011
Newton-Nations v. Betlach & Sebelius, District of Arizona and Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
Litigation Team and dfitzgerald CasesRead moreMedicaid beneficiaries in Arizona challenged Arizona’s decision to impose expensive copayments that exceeded the limits set out in federal law, creating barriers to beneficiaries’ access to services. Plaintiffs also challenged the United States Department of Health and Human Services approval of those copayments through the federal Section 1115 authority.…
- May 31, 2011
Pashby v. Cansler, Eastern District of North Carolina
Litigation Team and dfitzgerald CasesRead moreClass of Medicaid beneficiaries who received in-home personal care services challenged State’s decision to narrow the standards for assessing need for in home assistance and practice of favoring services provided in adult care homes over services provided in homes of Medicaid beneficiaries. Partners: Disability Rights NC, Charlotte Center for…
- January 1, 2011
KC and LS v. Wos & Shipman, United States District Court, Eastern District of North Carolina
Litigation Team CasesRead more2011 Medicaid beneficiaries with disabling and chronic conditions challenged North Carolina’s failure to ensure that managed care organizations provided them with adequate notice and opportunity for a hearing when their developmental disability services were reduced or terminated using arbitrary and non-ascertainable standards, denying beneficiaries a meaningful opportunity to challenge…
- February 6, 2009
Salazar v. District of Columbia D.D.C. and D.C. Circuit
Litigation Team and dfitzgerald CasesRead moreA class of Medicaid beneficiaries in the District of Columbia challenged widespread problems in DC’s Medicaid program, including failing to timely process Medicaid applications, terminating benefits without advanced notice, and denying children the full scope of benefits they are entitled to under the Early and Periodic, Screening, Diagnosis, and…
- April 7, 2008
McCartney v. Dempsey, Eastern District of North Carolina
Litigation Team and dfitzgerald CasesRead moreClass of Medicaid-eligible children with behavioral, emotional, or developmental conditions challenged North Carolina’s decision to deny or reduce their requests for mental and behavioral health services, and for making those decisions without providing adequate notice or informing them of the right to continue receiving benefits during the appeal. Partner:…
- August 29, 2005
Lankford v. Sherman, Western District of Missouri and Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals
Litigation Team and dfitzgerald CasesRead moreMedicaid beneficiaries in Missouri challenged a regulation which eliminated coverage for many items of durable medical equipment, such as nebulizers, catheters, suction pumps, apnea monitors, and wheelchair accessories or scooters. Coverage was eliminated even where a medical provider said the devices were medically necessary. Without this equipment, plaintiffs and…