Case: Medicaid
By: Jane Perkins
On December 18, 2024, the Supreme Court agreed to hear a case presenting the question: does the Medicaid free choice of provider provision, 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(23)(A), unambiguously confers a right upon beneficiaries to choose a specific provider? After giving some background on enforcement of the Medicaid Act, this Case Explainer focuses on this case.
When certiorari was granted, the case was called Kerr v. Planned Parenthood. Eunice Medina has since become the Interim Director of the South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services and, under federal rules, is substituted as the petitioner.
Case: Medicaid
Work requirements are one of the most insidious strategies to cut Medicaid because they do so by triggering coverage…
Work requirements in Medicaid risk creating unnecessary administrative burdens and increasing costs for states without achieving their intended goals.…
As we expect both legislative and administrative efforts to add work requirements to Medicaid, millions of individuals could lose…