- Show all
- Abigail Coursolle
- Alejandra Pavisich
- Alejandra Pavisich
- Alexis Robles-Fradet
- Alicia Emanuel
- Amanda Avery
- Amy Chen
- Andy DiAntonio
- Arielle Linsey
- Brian Brooks
- Candace Gibson
- Carly Myers
- Cassandra LaRose
- Cat Duffy
- Catherine McKee
- Cathren Cohen
- Charlie Blodnieks
- Charly Gilfoil
- Christina Piecora
- Corey Davis
- Dania Douglas
- Daniel Young
- daryln
- David Machledt
- Deanna Hartog
- Elizabeth Edwards
- Elizabeth G. Taylor
- Emma Parker-Newton
- Eskedar Girmash
- Fabiola Carrión
- Georgesula Ziama
- Geron Gadd
- Hannah Eichner
- Hayley Penan
- Héctor Hernández-Delgado
- Ian McDonald
- Jane Perkins
- Jasmine Young
- Jennifer Lav
- Joe McLean
- Kally Xu
- Kasey Nichols
- Kimberly Lewis
- Leonardo Cuello
- lhigashi
- Lisa Munoz
- Liz McCaman Taylor
- Madeline Morcelle
- Mara Youdelman
- Margaret Okakpu
- Maya Levin
- Michelle Lilienfeld
- Michelle Yiu
- Miriam Delaney Heard
- Mizue Suito
- Priscilla Huang
- Rachel Holtzman
- Rolonda Donelson
- Sarah Grusin
- Sarah Somers
- Skyler Rosellini
- Susan Berke Fogel
- T. Nancy Lam
- veng
- Wayne Turner
- Zamir M. Brown
- Show all
- Alabama
- Alaska
- All United States
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- District of Columbia
- Florida
- Georgia
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- National
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
- July 23, 2013
When Your Client Cannot Get Prescription Medications: Flowchart of Part D Appea
External Source Issue BriefRead moreThis flowchart developed by NHeLP and the National Senior Citizens Law Center guides advocates through the appeals, exceptions and grievances processes for problems their clients may have encountered with the Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit.
- July 23, 2013
Abortion, Judicial Bypass, and Recusal
Read moreAbortion, Judicial Bypass, and Recusal Recently, California voters rejected Proposition 73, a proposed constitutional amendment that would have required parental notification before an unemancipated minor could terminate her pregnancy. The proposition further imposed a mandatory 48-hour waiting period once notification was deemed to have occurred. In addition, the proposition…
- July 23, 2013
Protecting Reproductive Health Care for Low-Income Women
Read moreFor full publication text, download document.
- July 23, 2013
Access to Reproductive Health Services: A Checklist for Consumers and Advocates
Read moreIncreasingly, employers, private insurers, state Medicaid agencies and the federal Medicare program are contracting with hospitals and health care systems that do not provide the full scope of reproductive health services. Or, hospitals and health systems that restrict access to reproductive health services may be part of your…
- July 23, 2013
New Mexico Supreme Court Requires Medicaid to Cover All Medically Necessary Abo
External Source Issue BriefRead moreNM Supreme Court Requires Medicaid to Cover All Medically Necessary Abortions January 1999 The New Mexico Supreme Court has ruled that the State must cover all medically necessary abortions in its Medicaid program using State-only funds. While federal Medicaid dollars are available to pay for abortions…
- July 22, 2013
NHeLP Comments – Program Integrity Proposed Rules
Abbi Coursolle, David Machledt, and Mara Youdelman CommentsRead moreNHeLP's comments on HHS's June 2013 proposed rule on Exchange program integrity focus on the need to preserve access to abortions in plans outside the Exchanges, the importance of special enrollment periods when non-Exchange entities engage in misconduct, strengthening the consumer protections in the FFE's complaint resolution process, developing…