Harvard Law Blog: Grading the ACA as Equal Protection Statute

Harvard Law Blog: Grading the ACA as Equal Protection Statute

By mlawrence

The Affordable Care Act is sprawling. Some of its myriad provisions may (or may not!) reduce healthcare costs. Think of accountable care organizations, the hospital readmission reduction program, or even the preventive services mandate. And so, the Act’s success is often evaluated by asking whether it has helped reduce healthcare costs. (See, e.g., David Cutler here.)

Other of the ACA’s provisions are intended to promote financial security in the face of illness. The Act’s most litigated provisions, requiring that people buy insurance, expanding Medicaid, and creating exchanges, can be understood primarily in this light. And so, the Act’s success is also often evaluated by asking whether it has truly promoted financial security. (See today’s New York Times piece from Margoret Sangor-Katz on the subject of underinsurance post-ACA, or Aaron E. Carroll’s take from December.) Read the full article here. »

Related Content

#GivingTuesday

Support our work to advance health rights for low-income and underserved individuals with a donation today!

 

DONATE NOW